Пумпокольский:ekte-ket (Срсл.) "лепо (hübsch)"; ektem "gut" (the forms can also be Yug)
Примечания:ССЕ 230. Werner 1, 52 *aqtǝ; doubts (for an unclear reason) the relationship of Kott. hagši. The relationship of Kott. hamā 'good', haŋo 'better' is not quite clear (see Werner 1, 298).
Примечания:ССЕ 230. The self-denomination of the Arins, probably originally meaning 'warrior' (cf. the external evidence), and with a characteristic semantic transition 'Arin' > 'slave' in Kottish - apparently reflecting intertribal relations between Yenisseians. Werner 1, 57 (doubting the comparison without additional arguments).
Примечания:ССЕ 230. The words are quite obviously related and correspond to each other completely regularly. Nevertheless, Werner (1, 90) attempts to defend different solutions. The Ket form is analyzed as a compound *ʔapV + xur1 'hot water', although we would expect something like aul3 in this case (and a similar compound *ʔapVŋ-xur1 is attested as a:ŋ-ūl). Such an analysis is completely impossible for the Yug form (we would have afur), so for Yug Werner gives a separate reconstruction <*agǝl>. Finally, the Kottish word is found on p. 1, 291, quite separately, and with a note: vgl. ket. qōj1 ds. However, Ket. qōj1 is a rather transparent late Turkic loanword (cf. Oyr. qoju, Kaz. qoju id. etc.) and thus can have nothing to do with Kott. hagal. All these etymological "solutions" are rather difficult to justify.
Примечания:ССЕ 230. On the Kott. compound see also under *tu. Werner 1, 272 <*eje>, saying: "m.E. kann kot. C hautu 'Flußbusen' hiermit nicht zusammengestellt werden" - although correspondences are regular enough (except for the vowel e/a, but this is a rather frequent alternation), and Kott. hau-tu is an exact match of Ket ei-tu id. Note that Werner seems somewhat confused about this etymology: in 2, 262 he treats -tu as = Ket tū 'back, place between shoulders' (although the latter historically has a *-G-, see *tuGV); and in 2, 309 he reproduces the match Ket eitu = Kott. hautu again, this time without any objections, and with the reconstruction *tu.
Югский:axtaŋ5 / axta:hŋ4 / ɛxtaŋ5 / ɛxta:hŋ4, pl. axtaŋɨn5 / ɛxtaŋɨn5; (Кастр.) eäqta, pl. eäqtān "belt"
Коттский:hītēg, *hītēx, pl. hītakŋ "belt"; Ass. (Бол.) xitej id.
Аринский:ittä (Лоск.) "belt"
Примечания:ССЕ 231. Werner (...) explained the Yug form as a compound: *ɛʔx "groin" (?) + t (gen.) + a:hŋ "rope"; this is rather dubious, first of all, because the word ɛʔx 'groin', as far as I know, is not attested in any sources. The same explanation ("aχ / ɛχ 'Taille', 'Busen' (?) + t + a:hŋ 'Seil') is repeated in Werner 1, 88, however, with an additional possibility: "oder man könnte den ersten Teil dieses Wortes mit dem jug. Verbum aχtej 'zumachen' verbinden". Kott. hītēg is treated (Werner 1, 317) as a compound hit 'man' + thēg 'belt' (?). Despite all these hypotheses the straightforward comparison of ɛxtaŋ with Kott. hīteg remains for me the most plausible solution. Pump. (Срсл.) ekta 'belt' is most probably a recording of the Yug form. The stem indeed resembles a compound, but the components are so far unclear.
Праенисейский:*hǝgV-
Значение:pole of the tent (inner)
Кетский:ʌŋn5, pl. ʌŋńeŋ5
Югский:ʌŋńiŋ5, pl. -ɨn5
Коттский:hagīni, hagińe, pl. hagīnaŋan "Zeltstange"
Примечания:ССЕ 231. As seen in the analysis of *ʔǝča, the final nasals (both -n and -ŋ) must be original plural suffixes. Not quite clear is the relationship of Ket. iŋn5, Yug iŋnɨŋ5 'жердь (наружная)'. An old compound with this root is Ket. ɨ́-taq 'place where a tent was earlier' (see further discussion under *ʔǝča 'guest').
Примечания:ССЕ 231. Possibly connected with *h[ā]r1V 'taiga, wilderness, field' - although the vocalic relations are not quite clear. Werner 1, 315, 403 <*ǝʎ(ǝ) / *qǝʎǝ>.
Праенисейский:*huŕ-
Значение:saliva
Кетский:uĺǝŋ5; uĺtij6 "to spit"
Югский:urɨŋ5
Коттский:hujuŋ "spitting"; hujuŋakŋ "to spit"
Примечания:ССЕ 231. Ket > Selk. ulɨ, ūlɨŋ 'saliva' (see Helimski КС 248). Werner 2, 334: says that "da in den ket. und jug. Wörtern ul- / ur- eindeutig auf ūl' 'Wasser' oder 'feucht' zurückgeht, bleibt der Vergleich mit kot. hujuŋ 'Speien' fraglich". I still prefer to directly compare the completely regularly matching and semantically identical uĺǝŋ - urɨŋ - hujuŋ; the reflex of *huŕ- in Ket-Yug of course coincides with the reflex of *xur1 'water', but this is a purely phonetic development.
Примечания:ССЕ 231. An expressive root; the connection of the Ket-Yug and Kott. forms is possible if d- is a historical prefix. Werner 1, 328 (but cf. also *kɨ̄j-).
Примечания:ССЕ 231. Probably the same root as in PY *sVs- 'sit' (q.v.). The status of the elements *h- and *s- is not quite clear: the former may be a preverb, the latter - either also a preverb or an archaic reduplication. It is also possible that *sVs- is a form similar to *ta-s- 'stand up' (q.v.), i.e. an original compound *sV+(hV)s- "be seated". Werner 2, 359 *ǝsǝ(ŋ) / *usǝ(ŋ).
Примечания:ССЕ 232. The Pump. form eg "egg" (Кл.) is in reality Yug. Ket ɛʔj, according to all external evidence, is a result of re-analyzing the plural form ēŋ (although Werner 1, 256 suggests the opposite). Although *jeŋ 'egg' and *jɔŋ 'roe' are distinguished within Yenisseian, the forms are still hard to separate: an old Ablaut is probable in this case (see КС 159). Werner (1, 256, 2, 43) reconstructs <*eʔj / *eŋ> 'egg' and <*oj / *uj, pl. oʔŋ> 'roe', separating the two words; he, however, fails to explain d́- in Kott. d́anan and t- in Pump. tańaŋ (quite regular reflexes of PY *j-), and also tries to relate Kott. šulei 'egg' - as shown by Helimski (1982, 71), a quite transparent Samoyed loanword.
