Югский:xa:hŋ, pl. xaŋen1 (cf. also М., Сл. xáhaŋa 'hawk')
Коттский:kéŋa-fuj (Ass.) "owl"
Примечания:ССЕ 257. Werner 2, 68 <*qaʔǝŋǝ>. The roots *qǟŋa and *kVg- (q.v.) are actively contaminating; the former must have originally meant a hawk or kite, while the latter - some kind of owl.
Примечания:ССЕ 257. Rather strange is the plural form pointing to *qeʔʒ- (~χ-,-ǯ-): a suppletive stem? or a compound *qeʔs+ *ʔeʔǯVŋ (see *ʔeʔǯ- 'damp sand')? Werner 1, 84-85 <*qeʔs / *qeʔt'>: relates here Arin kes, Pump. kit 'stone', despite the fact that these forms completely regularly reflect a different root, PY *čɨʔs 'stone'. He also tries to connect Kott. hanaŋ 'shore', on the Uralic origin of which see under *qäʔj.
Примечания:ССЕ 258. Werner 2, 83-84: suggests that the first element may be *χ[e]ʔ 'big', supporting this idea by the separability of the root in Ket t-qä-ŋ-tas-dʌŋdʌjen 'we are pregnant' etc. If this is not a secondary insertion of -ŋ-, we should rather think of a root *tis 'belly' (?).
Примечания:Werner 2, 85 *qephǝn: the addition of the Yug forms allows to change the reconstruction from *qeń- ( ~ χ-) in ССЕ 258 to *qepVn- ( ~ χ-). Cf. Kott. (Werner 1, 325) hōp(e)tal 'Satteldecke, Teppich'?
Примечания:ССЕ 259. Werner 2, 149 *qǝk-t'ak (altes Kompositum). The word may indeed be an old compound, but the second component should be rather reconstructed as *čaq, and is probably the same as in *čaq-pǝm q.v.
Югский:xɨʔ, pl. xʌdɨŋ5 (Werner 2, 152-153: χʌ́d́iŋ)
Примечания:ССЕ 258-259. Werner 2, 152-153 <*qɨʔ / *qǝd'ǝ>. The roots for "bow" and "skewer / beam" (**"arrow"?) tend to contaminate in Ket-Yug.; perhaps they should be even united historically, but morphological details are not clear.
