Comments:EAS 122, Poppe 80, 83, 111. Mong. may be < Turk., see Щербак 1997, 162. There is also a possibility of confusion of this root with *p`i̯ŭ̀ri q. v. - in Turkic their reflexes could have merged, and in Mong. some dialects (cf. the Dagur form) may reflect *hürgü-.