BEN E. KING
Recording years |
Main genre |
Music sample |
1959–2010 |
Classic R&B |
I (Who Have Nothing)
(1963) |
Page
contents:
|
|
|
||||||
Album
released: May 1, 1961 |
V |
A |
L |
U |
E |
More info: |
||
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
||||
Tracks: 1) Amor; 2) Sway; 3) Come Closer
To Me; 4) Perfidia; 5) Granada; 6) Sweet And Gentle; 7) Quizas, Quizas,
Quizas (Perhaps, Perhaps, Perhaps); 8) Frenesi; 9) Souvenir Of Mexico; 10)
Besame Mucho; 11) Love Me, Love Me; 12) Spanish
Harlem. |
||||||||
REVIEW Benjamin Earl
Nelson’s earliest wave of fame was raised by his hit singles with The
Drifters — not The Drifters of the Clyde McPhatter and the David Baughan
years, but a completely new version of The Drifters which used to be The Five
Crowns, a New York-based doo-wop group working on the same circuit. That new
version, musically supervised by guardian angels Jerry Leiber and Mike
Stoller, had become a veritable monster hit-making machine, with songs such
as ‘There Goes My Baby’ and ‘Save The Last Dance For Me’ reaching the kind of
mainstream popularity that the original Drifters could never even dream of.
However, in the end the new Drifters, directed by the same ironic hand of
Fate, suffered the same fate as the old ones — like Clyde McPhatter before
him, Ben E. King decided that he was being unfairly ripped off by his
management and officially broke up with the band to begin a solo career. |
||||||||
The decision was not as risky as one might surmise;
first, by going solo King was not losing any serious business support — not
only would he be staying with Atlantic, but he’d even inherit the
Leiber-Stoller coaching from the Drifters — and second, there were some
auspicious precedents, most notably Clyde McPhatter himself, who’d gone on
for several more successful years as a solo artist after splitting off from
the Drifters (that success wouldn’t last for much longer, but in 1960 Clyde
was still a pretty hot proposition, and Ben probably thought he could do even
better). Additionally, Ben was not just a singer; he had a knack for
establishing his own artistic style, and although he never played any
instruments, he could generate musical ideas in his head for other people to
realize (like Jim Morrison, to name a more famous case). Finally, he had that
rare visual combination of dashing African-American masculinity with
smoothness and suaveness, which could endear him to multi-racial audiences —
no doubt here that just as many moody white ladies went crazy over the man as
the black girls did. The first couple of solo Ben E. King singles,
however, did relatively little for him, and it is not difficult to see why: ‘A Help-Each-Other Romance’,
recorded as a duet with LaVern Baker, was simply too old-fashioned for 1960.
It sounded like a straightforward R&B number from around 1955, with the
appropriate production values and the same kind of rough and raggedy
saxophone background that rallied so many people around the genre back then,
but was already seen as obsolete in an era that — at least, in the eyes of
the leaders of the record industry — called for more subtlety and
sentimentality. Another single, ‘First Taste Of Love’, sounded way too much
like a hasty rewrite, by the Pomus-Shuman team, of their own ‘Save The Last
Dance For Me’. It fared a little better on the charts than ‘A Help Each-Other
Romance’, but overall it was clear that in order to properly launch a satsifactory solo career,
King needed something outstanding. Salvation and immortality came by way of ‘Spanish
Harlem’, which I would not hesitate to call one of the most elegant and
tasteful ballads of the year 1960. Curiously, the song is credited not to the
usual Leiber-Stoller team, but rather to Jerry Leiber and Phil Spector; the
latter, at the time, was under a sort of «apprenticeship» to the duo, and
managed to replace Stoller on this particular occasion by arriving at
Leiber’s house an hour earlier than the agreement (so the legend goes,
anyway) — Stoller only arrived in time to add the famous marimba intro riff
(whose chords bear an uncanny resemblance to the main melody of the Crickets’
‘More Than I Can Say’, by the way, though Stoller expands it into a more
complex and twisted musical phrase). King’s own role in the song is fairly humble; he gives
an appropriate vocal performance that could be easily matched by many other
singers with his type of baritone. On other recordings, he could sound more
flexible or more theatrical, more prone to improvisation or ad-libbing, but
‘Spanish Harlem’ is really all about honoring the glory of a great musical
hook. The song has no chorus, no bridge section, and a very brief fade-out
coda; it delivers its message in but two vocal and one instrumental verse,
and that’s quite enough to brand it as an absolute classic of the romantic
pop genre — although, if you listen closely to the melody and observe its
synergy with the lyrics, you can quickly perceive that the sentiment of the
tune goes deeper and darker than generic suaveness. Lyrics-wise, the song emphasizes, in its first
verse, the idea of reclusiveness
("It is a special one, it’s never
seen the sun / It only comes out when the moon is on the run / And all the
stars are gleaming"), and in the second verse, the idea of possession ("I’m going to pick that rose / And watch her as she grows in MY garden").
I certainly get a bit of a Beauty And
The Beast vibe from this narrative, as if it were sung from the Beast’s
perspective — and the melody largely obeys the lyrical message, as each verse
starts out with the pretty, but humble and inconspicuous marimba riff, then
begins unfurling, faster and faster and faster, rising upwards to a climax
(that is when the moon is on the run and the rose opens up, I guess?), and
then quickly winding down and settling back in again, as if it were all about
the protagonist making sure that nobody else
gets access to the treasure. So it’s really that kind of «this beauty is for myself and myself only»
song. It is this tight integration of melody and lyrics
which is the reason why the song never really worked so well in Aretha
Franklin’s decade-later rendition. She would clumsily change "a rose in Spanish Harlem" to
"a rose in Black and Spanish
Harlem" (I’m sorry, but Black Harlem and Spanish Harlem are two
different, if adjacent, locations; how can the same rose be present at once
in two different locations? are we talking quantum theory here?), pretty much
eliminate the «unfurling» sensation from the middle of the verse, and give
the whole song an artificial subtext of «black is beautiful» that it never
had in the first place. Honestly, the vibe of the song has more to do with
Sting’s ‘Roxanne’ than Black Pride, though I don’t remember Sting ever coming
up with such gorgeous musical embodiments of his damsels-in-distress’ beauty
as Leiber, Stoller, and arranger Stan Applebaum do here in the instrumental
verse — few individual moments are more breathtaking in the history of the
Atlantic label than when the soprano sax comes in at 1:52 to take over the
«unfurling» part of the melody. By that time, admittedly, the very presence
of Ben E. King on the track has become one of its least significant details,
which is why it is ‘Stand By Me’ and not this track that would go on to
become the «quintessential Ben E. King» song, but in overall terms of
«musical immaculacy» ‘Spanish Harlem’ will always receive at least twice the
amount of points from me. If there ever was one particular problem with this
particular recording of ‘Spanish Harlem’, though, it is that, despite being
performed by a distinct African-American performer, there was virtually
nothing «black» about the song in question. (Hence the upcoming Aretha
amendment, which «africanizes» the song to just about the same extent as a "yo, wassup, Leporello?" would «africanize»
Don Giovanni). The lyrics can be
traced back all the way to courtly European poetry, and the melody, true to
the song’s location, takes a bit of a cue from the average Mexican mariachi serenade.
Not that singing it was in any way a crime for the artist — on the contrary,
at the time it could be counted as a highly progressive move, intentionally
fuzzifying the borders between «black R&B» and «white (art-)pop»; and
given the inventive and fresh nature of the song, it was definitely a more
tasteful and respectful decision than, for instance, having Sam Cooke record
all those crappy collections of old Tin Pan Alley schlock. But it was also a
time when a genius move could be easily misconstrued and give rise to
disastrous tackiness — in the end, it’s much easier for us today to look at the
whole process as a part of history than it was for its actual participants to
take an impartial look at themselves right in the middle of things. In this case, the logic was technically impeccable: Ben
E. King just recorded a Latin-themed song that became a massive hit — ergo, while the iron is hot, let’s
have Ben E. King record an entire album
of Latin-themed songs for all those new fans of his to enjoy! Oh, and if
those Leiber and Stoller guys are unavailable to write eleven more songs for
our guy, no problem: we’ll just select eleven random favorites from the Latin
market and have Stan Applebaum juice them up. I mean, if you liked Ben E. King
singing ‘Spanish Harlem’, you’ll also like him singing ‘Besame Mucho’, right?
Quite a nice display of cultural hybridization it’ll be, and right on time
what with Ray Charles no longer doing that kind of shit for our label... At the dawn of my reviewing career, when my
tolerance for crass moves like these was about 0%, I would have probably
dismissed Spanish Harlem — the LP,
not the song — right out of hand; and, frankly speaking, even today I think
it should be obvious for everybody involved just how much of an artistic gap
lies between the album’s title track (prudently saved for last) and
everything else recorded for it. Not even the general public could be fooled
that easily: the LP did not chart at all, although one other track later
taken off it and released as a single (Gabriel Ruiz’ ‘Amor’) managed to make
it into the Top 20 (one must, however, take note that it was issued right on
the heels of ‘Stand By Me’ — with King being at the absolute peak of his
popularity in mid-1961, one should never underestimate the basic power of
momentum). It is not that the material assembled for King’s «Latin
Lover» album is crappy — Mexican pop music has never been one of my favorite
genres, but the catchiness and compositional virtues of some of these melodies
are undeniable, and besides, publicly twirling your nose at stuff like ‘Besame
Mucho’ or ‘Perfidia’ is a bit like publicly urinating on an Egyptian pyramid:
you can only highlight your own pitiful insignificance in the process. And it
is certainly not that Ben E. King, either visually or vocally, cannot
personify the stereotype of a passionate Latin lover. His timbre, his
phrasing, his languishing hums and moans, his willingness to close his eyes
and imaginatively transport himself into the middle of a fiesta (or maybe a
siesta) under the hot Mexican sun — it definitely works. He’s got the kind of artistic versatility that none of Atlantic’s
male stars really had up to this point: definitely more chameleonesque and,
perhaps, even more self-confident than Clyde McPhatter, the man can really do
it all. The question is: should
he really have done it all? Upon relistening to the record for a couple of
times and also — quite importantly — comparing some of the covers with the
original hit versions, I think that the album works in places, namely, those places where Leiber and Stoller try to
do something interesting and challenging (if never too unconventional) with
the source material. Thus, ‘Amor’ was mostly familiar to the radio-friendly
public from slow, lush, croony versions by Bing Crosby and Andy Russell. Here,
the arrangers drastically speed up the tempo, giving the song more of a bossa
nova flavor, and King coherently imbues it with a sense of expediency and
impatience that is altogether lacking in all those old serenade-style renditions.
By the end, the song almost turns into a high-testosterone-level, fully
danceable jam, so perhaps there was
a real reason rather than pure name attraction for which the public still
bought it as a single. On the other hand, the above-mentioned ‘Perfidia’,
performed here as a HOT, LUSTY
tango number, and ‘Besame Mucho’, alternating between two different tempos,
do not do too much to register as performances that transcend their own clichés.
And there is absolutely nothing to stop ‘Sway’ from being as corny as the
version popularized by Dean Martin in 1954; you could just as easily sneak King’s
version into any random figure skating competition, where it belongs by
definition. These recordings all fall prey to the musical tropes of their
source material rather than trying to use them as a trampoline for anything
slightly different, though I do admit that Leiber, Stoller, and Applebaum are
all quite busy working on making them stand out in some ways. It’s just that certain tasks are insurmountable. One could place some hope, perhaps, into the only two
(in addition to ‘Spanish Harlem’) original numbers on the record. Unfortunately,
‘Souvenir Of Mexico’, contributed by the Pomus-Shuman team, is a throwaway,
shuffling along without any interesting hooks and with a rather disinterested
vocal performance from King. And Ben’s own ‘Love Me, Love Me’ takes its cues
both from ‘Save The Last Dance For Me’ and the bridge section of Elvis’ ‘I Need
Your Love Tonight’, mashing them together in an okay synthesis which also
comes quite short on hooks. In other words, writing a «Mexican love song» for the project turned out to be an
even more tedious task than re-inventing or re-arranging one. Perhaps the conceptuality of the approach deserves a
formal medal — the bravery of Atlantic, an almost «pure» R&B label opting
to put out an entirely Spanish-themed record, has to be admired — but
something tells me that the average fan of Latin pop music would rather look
on this project indignantly, as an example of (unsuccessful) cultural
appropriation; while the average fan of the classic Atlantic R&B sound
might condemn Spanish Harlem for
opening up (along with other similar projects) a fairly questionable era in
the history of the label, when it began to consistently water down its tough
and gritty Fifties’ sound with suave, sentimental, orchestrated compositions
for the adult (possibly even white
adult, oh my goodness!) audience. Indeed, taken together with something like
the Coasters’ One By One from only
a few months back, one could easily form the impression that Atlantic was
trying to... turn into a pop label? Well, blame it on the times: everybody was going pop
in 1961 — you could, in fact, regard this little period of pre-British Invasion
«maturity» as the first of many waves of poptimism
half a century before the term was even coined — and Ben E. King, with his
vocal talents that could effortlessly carry him across genres and styles (not
to mention those dashing good looks!), was the perfect spearhead for Atlantic’s
submission to the general trend. Yet, for all the overall disappointment it
could bring, it was also a trend responsible for an occasional rose in Spanish Harlem, growing in the street, right up through
the concrete, but soft and sweet and dreaming — and for each early Sixties’
masterpiece like that, I’m sure we will be willing to forget a dozen concurrent
exercises in the crass and the corny. |