HERMAN’S HERMITS
Recording years |
Main genre |
Music sample |
1964–1970 |
Classic pop-rock |
Page
contents:
|
|
|
||||||
Album
released: Feb. 13, 1965 |
V |
A |
L |
U |
E |
More info: |
||
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
||||
Tracks: 1) I’m
Into Something Good; 2) Mrs. Brown, You’ve
Got A Lovely Daughter; 3) Kansas City Loving; 4) I Wonder; 5) Sea
Cruise; 6) Walkin’ With My Angel; 7) Show Me Girl; 8) I Understand (Just How
You Feel); 9) Mother-In-Law; 10) Your Hand In Mine; 11) I Know Why; 12)
Thinking Of You. |
||||||||
REVIEW In
the first week of September 1964, ‘You Really Got Me’ by the Kinks officially
entered the UK charts, and by mid-September it managed to reach the #1 spot,
where it proudly remained for two weeks. The song was a major milestone not
only for the Kinks themselves, who would go on to become one of Britain’s
(and the world’s) most melodic, inventive, and intelligent bands of all time,
but also for the evolution of rock music into hard rock, heavy metal, punk
rock, and lots of other sub-genres. It helped open up new horizons, boldly
went where no Londoner had gone before, and stimulated hundreds of thousands
of people to open their eyes and ears to new musical possibilities. |
||||||||
In the third week of September 1964, ‘I’m Into
Something Good’ by Herman’s Hermits officially entered the UK charts, and by
the end of September it managed to reach the #1 spot, knocking off ‘You
Really Got Me’, where it proudly remained for two weeks. The song was a major
milestone not only for Herman’s Hermits themselves, who would go on to become
the UK’s cheesiest export to the USA and
the proverbial laughing stock of the Sixties, but also for the evolution of a
genre which, for lack of a better term, I would propose to call «Diaper Rock»
— a simplified, trivialized form of pop music in the formal format of a rock
band; not so much of an actual musical genre as an ideological approach, to
be picked up by the Monkees, the Archies, the Osmonds, the Bay City Rollers,
and ultimately leading all the way down to the boy bands of the 1990s and
(somewhat arguably) modern day crap like Imagine Dragons and the 1975. Consequently, we can all hail September 30, 1964 as
«The Real Day That Music Died». Now, of course, [adopting
a boring, pedantic tone], this is a figurative exaggeration, and one
could probably even argue that the music died at least a month earlier, when
a glorious five-week run of the Animals’ ‘House Of The Rising Sun’, the
Stones’ ‘It’s All Over Now’, and the Beatles’ ‘A Hard Day’s Night’ was ended
with the victory of Manfred Mann’s ‘Do Wah Diddy Diddy’, another classic
early example of «diaper rock» — and there may be even earlier examples. Yet
for some reason, it is this particular chart victory of Herman’s Hermits over
the Kinks that holds a sort of symbolic significance for my mind, if only
because the two bands seem so diametrically opposed to each other. I mean,
after all Manfred Mann were at least professionals, whose musical interests
and ambitions went in many different directions; Herman’s Hermits, on the
other hand, were born in diapers and went on to die without taking them off
their heads. I mean, how seriously can one take a band that was
named after Sherman from The Adventures
Of Rocky And Bullwinkle once somebody in Manchester noted the resemblance
between the red-haired, gap-toothed cartoon boy and Peter
Noone, lead singer of the Heartbeats (as they were originally called)? Then,
of course, once Sherman got simplified to Herman (because everything about the band had to be
simplified), at least if you were American at the time, you probably could
not help getting a subconscious association with the country’s most famous
Herman at the time — Herman Munster of The
Munsters, who was definitely a bit bigger than Peter Noone but still
similar in some ways. (And isn’t it totally weird that The Munsters launched on September 24, 1964, a mere six days
before The Music Died?..) And while «Herman’s Hermits» is a beautiful
alliteration in itself, the name ultimately suggests a circus troupe rather
than a rock band — well, actually, the band was somewhat of a cross between
the two. By now you might have formed the wrong impression
that this writer hates and despises ‘I’m Into Something Good’ with the same
passion that he had formerly reserved for the likes of Kansas’ ‘Dust In The
Wind’ or Aerosmith’s power ballads. Nothing could be further from the truth,
though. First, ‘I’m Into Something Good’ is a Goffin / King song, and Carole
King never wrote a bad song in the Sixties. Second, ‘I’m Into Something Good’
is chirpy, fun, optimistic, and impossible to hate. It was already cute and
cuddly when originally recorded by Earl-Jean of the Cookies (the same girl
group that originally did ‘Chains’, which the Beatles covered on Please Please Me), and Herman’s
Hermits further polished its rather rudimentary piano-based melody, adding
jangly folk-pop guitar (and throwing out the meddlesome saxophone on the
instrumental break). And, for what it’s worth — while the teeny-weeny ditty
about how "last night I met a new boy in the neighborhood" might
have seemed perfect for the naïve-romantic looks of the Cookies,
Earl-Jean McCrea was actually 22 years old in 1964, whereas Peter
"Herman" Noone had not even turned 17 when the single was released,
so Herman’s Hermits were even more
qualified for an authentic anthem about teenage dating. So the song itself is perfectly fine for what it is
— as is every other song recorded by Herman’s Hermits in a similar style.
What is not perfectly fine is that
an entire frickin’ nation went
head-over-heels for it (after all, the song could not have shot to #1 merely
on the strength of 17-year olds saving up their lunch money to buy the
single), and that its impact spread over to the US as well, where the single
made it to #13 and gave the band full access to the American market, which
they would go on to have an active share in for the next two years. In fact,
as it happened with quite a few other British Invasion acts as well, the
American market began capitalizing on the band’s potential far more rapidly
than the lazy British market: the group’s first LP, the self-titled Herman’s Hermits (sometimes referred
to as Introducing Herman’s Hermits
because of the inscription on the back of the sleeve), came out in February
1965, a whole four months before a record with the same title, but a
decidedly different track list, would be issued in the UK. Because of this,
and also because the US-based MGM did a better job of packaging the band’s
singles into LPs, here I will be following the American rather than the
British discography — exactly the same way that I do with the Animals, who
got a very similar deal, possibly because both bands were managed by the
exact same deal-breaker, the infamous Mickie Most, who was responsible for
the careers of as many excellent artists as truly horrendous ones throughout
his lifetime. The American debut LP arrived just in time to
include the band’s first two singles: ‘Something Good’ was quickly followed
by ‘Show Me Girl’, a new song which, so it seems, was already specially
commissioned from Goffin and King in light of the previous success — and,
while it is not bad as such, was probably knocked off by the songwriting duo
in about 15 minutes. While seemingly following the same formula as ‘Something
Good’, the combination of its melody and lyrics lacks the feel-perky
sunny-morning vibe of its predecessor and has nowhere near the same emotional
impact — not surprisingly, it failed to repeat its success, stalling at #19
and, furthermore, exposing the vocal limits of Noone, whose higher range is
really weak and wobbly. Who needed this
kind of stuff from the Manchester boys when you could have much tighter acts,
like the Hollies, doing the whole love-plea shtick in a far more convincing
manner? But the real disaster struck when it came to
actually recording an entire LP’s worth of material. At the end of the day,
Herman’s Hermits were amateurs, a pack of nice young Manchester lads who
could barely play their instruments (there is still a lot of debate about
which songs the band did play on and which ones were salvaged by session
musicians), with a lead singer more suitable for comic performances on a
second-rate TV show than the position of an actual frontman in a pop-rock
band. Without any solid players or competent songwriters in the band, how
could they pull it off? Arguably the only
way they could pull it off was by including as many lightweight, comical,
vaudeville-style numbers as possible — and the rule of thumb, both about this
album and all of its successors, is that the more serious the band is trying
to get, the flatter it falls on its face. The worst cases are sentimental
ballads: ‘I Wonder’, credited to a certain Richard Pearson, is a slow «moody»
waltz with non-existent musicianship and a vocal performance on the level of
an average junior school vocal talent show (I think they were going for the
classic suicidal Shangri-La’s vibe here, but they should have stuck with the
Cookies), and ‘I Understand’ is a doo-wop cover that goes all the way back to
The Four Tunes in 1954, but this
version more closely follows a recent hit by Freddie & The Dreamers, who
came up with the «brilliant» idea of merging the doo-wop original with a
stanza from ‘Auld Lang Syne’ — and believe me, you don’t want to hear Herman’s Hermits sing ‘Auld Lang Syne’ any
more than you want KISS performing Liebestod. Similarly, you probably
wouldn’t want your Herman’s Hermits getting too close to actual rock’n’roll
territory: their cover of ‘Kansas City’ (for some reason, listed as ‘Kansas
City Loving’ on the album) is limp and lousy, with no energy whatsoever and
one of the worst excuses for a guitar solo in the history of 1964-1965. But
they do sound a bit more tight and
inspired on the comedy number ‘Sea Cruise’, which they nicked from the legacy
of comedy-rock hero Huey "Piano" Smith. Maybe this is one of the tracks on which they used session musicians,
because the rhythm section sounds much more collected and the lead guitar
work is at least cohesive. It is also possible to listen to Allen Toussaint’s
‘Mother-In-Law’ (originally recorded by New Orleanian R&B singer Ernie
K-Doe) and to ‘Walkin’ With My Angel’, yet another Goffin / King number that
was a hit for Bobby Vee in 1961 — they manage to give the song a nice
country-rock reading instead of the slightly more carnivalesque atmosphere of
Bobby’s original. (Hilariously, every time I put on the song I keep expecting
that opening bassline to resolve into the open E of ‘Psycho Killer’... and it
fuckin’ never does, what a bummer). There is a
weak attempt at original songwriting with ‘I Know Why’, originally the B-side
to ‘Show Me Girl’, a fast-paced sweet soft pop ditty credited to Derek
Leckenby, the band’s lead guitar player; but soft crooning romance is yet
another area in which Herman’s Hermits suck, next to moody morose melancholy
and all-out rocking, and even a surprisingly smooth and melodic acoustic
guitar break does not save the song, and its writer, from total oblivion. So, can we actually be into something else that’s good here, other than the
lead-in track and the other (inferior) Goffin / King covers? Well, yes, as a
matter of fact, it is this album which
features the original apparition of Herman’s Hermits’ second greatest success
— their cover of ‘Mrs. Brown, You’ve Got A Lovely Daughter’, a cute-corny
little vaudeville number that was originally sung by actor Tom Courtenay in The Lads, a 1963 TV play. This is precisely the kind of material
that was tailor-made for Herman’s Hermits — cute, eccentric, and oh-so-very-British.
Peter Noone goes all the way to put up a heavy accent ("luvly
daughtah"), Leckenby and Hopwood do their best to conjure a mid-Fifties
skiffle atmosphere, and the song becomes a perfect atmospheric counterpoint
to ‘I’m Into Something Good’ — a bit of a broken-hearted disappointment after
such an optimistic morning. Instructively, the song was not even released in the
UK as a single — never intended to — but when tentatively put out on the
American market, one month after it had already appeared on the LP, it shot
up all the way to #1. That’s how
strong the American love for all things markedly British was at the time; the
American popularity of ‘Mrs. Brown’ (as well as its sequel about Henry the
VIIIth, which we shall discuss in our next review) might arguably be the
single biggest testimony to just how far the Yankees would go at the time to
swear back their allegiance to the Crown. (Great idea for a movie, by the
way: the British turn back the sands of time and manage to win the War of
Independence by sending Herman’s Hermits into the past and making them play
‘Mrs. Brown, You’ve Got A Lovely Daughter’ to the Americans at Lexington and
Concord). Jokes aside... no, wait, it is just too dangerous to
put aside the jokes when talking about Herman’s Hermits. Jokes not aside, the self-titled LP has two
really fun tracks (the first two, that is), three or four mildly tolerable
ones, and a ton of dreck which
cannot be redeemed by the simple fact that it was all recorded in 1964-1965,
and therefore it must all be good. But this should by no means undermine the
legendary historical significance of the first months of Herman’s Hermits’
musical career. Obviously, there had already been lots of minor, not
particularly talented artists in the British Invasion, but Herman’s Hermits
were actually the first successful act to intentionally
launch the process of dumbing down the entire movement, and reap the
correlated commercial benefits — and that certainly has got to count as an
achievement. |
|
|
|
||||||
Album
released: June 1965 |
V |
A |
L |
U |
E |
More info: |
||
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
||||
Tracks: 1) Can’t You Hear My Heartbeat; 2)
I’m Henry VIII, I Am; 3) The End Of The World;
4) For Your Love; 5) I Gotta Dream On; 6) Don’t Try To Hurt Me; 7)
Silhouettes; 8) Heartbeat; 9) I’ll Never Dance Again; 10) Tell Me Baby; 11)
Traveling Light. |
||||||||
REVIEW If
you see a Sixties’ record by somebody called On Tour, keep in mind that (a) this is a US-only album by a UK
artist, (b) this is not a concert
album, (c) this is almost certainly a bastard release of odds and ends from
the respective artist’s past, present, and even future (in that sometimes it
hosts songs that would only later
be released on the proper UK album). The
Animals On Tour works exactly the same way, and later still, Magic Bus: The Who On Tour would also
become one of the weirdest entries in The Who’s discographic history.
Nevertheless, some of these LPs did have the advantages of hosting some songs
that would only be released in the UK as singles, or not released at all —
and they also gave US fans a much earlier opportunity to acquire a
long-playing record by their idols than UK fans. Indeed, by the time Herman’s
Hermits got their second US album, they were still waiting to get permission
for a first one in their own homeland: and the UK edition of Herman’s Hermits, following this
summer release in the fall, would essentially be On Tour with three tracks (all the singles!) replaced by three
LP-only tracks from the US edition of Herman’s
Hermits. |
||||||||
Let’s start off with the singles, because 90% of all
our hopes that occasionally Herman’s Hermits might really be "into something good" rest on the
singles anyway. ‘Can’t You Hear My Heartbeat’, written by the songwriting
team of John Carter and Ken Lewis and put out in January ’65, is a jolly and
upbeat pop anthem very much in the early Goffin/King style, the ideal kind of
contribution for the level of Herman’s Hermits — and, understandably, one of
the weaker cuts when it was borrowed several months later by Marianne
Faithfull for her debut album. (Even then, I think that her seductive solo
vocal, as compared to the Hermits’ multi-tracked singing, and the baroque
harpsichord arrangement as compared to the fairly simplistic electric guitar
on the original, at least try to
make an improvement — not something that can be often said about the Hermits
themselves when they cover other people’s songs). As usual, the only
offensive thing about such a song is that it shot to #2 on the US charts...
then again, let’s not advance the US charts too much credit. The next single, ‘Silhouettes’, forces me to make a
correction because that, indeed, is a rare case when the Hermits’ attempt at
modernizing an oldie works pretty damn well — not that it tells us anything
about the specific artistic genius of Herman’s Hermits, because essentially
what we have here is a patterned conversion of a stereotypical Fifties’
doo-wop hit into an equally stereotypical mid-Sixties pop-rock song. Our input: a slow,
horn-enhanced, catchy-romantic serenade delivered by The Rays in a polite,
sentimental Fifties fashion. Our output: a slightly sped up, guitar-enhanced,
catchy-romantic serenade delivered by Peter Noone in a joyful, youthful,
exuberant Sixties fashion. It does not take much imagination to develop this
thread further and realize how the same song would sound in the Seventies
(bombastic production), the Eighties (synth-pop), the Nineties (Oasis-style
boring crunchy guitars), and the 21st century (umm... Autotune?). But what
the heck, at least the melody is memorable. Skipping then right through ‘Mrs. Brown’ (which was
already discussed earlier) and a completely useless version of Sam Cooke’s
‘Wonderful World’ (which somehow failed to make it onto any of the LPs), we
now get to the age of big business with the one and only song that Herman’s
Hermits are going to be remembered for: ‘I’m Henery The VIII, I Am’ (although
on the US album it was boringly spelled ‘Henry’, that extra e is actually totally crucial for the
song’s success). The original, hilariously inverting the trope of Henry VIII
and his wives by turning it into a story of one widow and her eight husbands
all named Henry, was a big vaudeville smash for Harry Champion in the
early 1910s — and the «honor» of reviving it for the pop-rock age of the
Sixties actually belongs not to Peter Noone, but to the early UK skiffle and
rock’n’roll pioneer Joe
Brown, who pretty much pre-shaped the song for the Hermits from top to
bottom. For Brown, this was sort of a natural thing, though, since he was
interested from the start in integrating the American rock’n’roll sound with
the UK popular tradition out of pure love for both; Herman’s Hermits had a
far more pragmatic role to play — as one of Britain’s most promising exports
to the US, they had to consistently deliver that British quirkiness and
eccentricity to a hungry US audience, deprived of organic entertainment by their
colonial masters for almost 200 years... ...er, uhm, anyway, those rock’n’roll guitar licks
you hear played at the beginning of the song, as if it’s gonna be an angry
rhythm’n’blues number instead of a vaudeville joke — they’re actually copied
from Joe Brown’s version, except they’re thicker and louder, and also there’s
a relentlessly plowing bass bottom that almost overpowers the rhythm guitar,
and then Peter Noone’s vocal is also louder, more aggressive and obnoxious
than Brown’s quiet tone. Think of the transition as «modest rockabilly
corrupts itself into brash pub-rock», and you might be getting somewhere. On
top of that, Noone’s hyperbolic, braggardly exhibited Cockney accent on the
song might be the most transparent
representation of Britain’s lower classes to be presented to the American
market by 1965 — ultimately, the song became sort of a cult favorite for both
the UK and the US punk scene a decade later. And not just because of the
vocals, but mostly because of how gleefully it revels in its own simplicity
and stupidity. Yes, the arrangement may have been borrowed from Joe Brown,
but nowhere in Joe Brown’s version do we find the classic "SECOND VERSE, SAME AS THE FIRST!"
(even if Joe’s second verse is
indeed the same as the first) that would, ten years later, be famously
borrowed by the Ramones for their own ‘Judy Is A Punk’. If only the typical
Herman’s Hermits repertoire consisted of songs like ‘Henery’... but then if
it did, they would have entered the musical annals as pioneers of «comedy rock»
or «goof-off rock» or whatever, an early precursor to the Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah
Band and the like, and this would not be quite
right. In some strangely perverse manner, I now begin to think that the few
songs like ‘Mrs. Brown’ and ‘Henery’ actually work better in the context of
general pop music evolution when they are surrounded by boring and inadequate
«serious» filler than if they were entirely and completely surrounded by
goofy vaudeville and nothing but goofy vaudeville. It sort of goes like this:
Herman’s Hermits are a bland, untalented band that fails every time it tries
to take itself seriously, but succeeds almost every time it takes itself
stupidly. But if it always took
itself stupidly, who would even pay serious attention to them in the first
place?.. So I’m not going to waste a lot of time bashing all
those other songs on this album;
most of them really just exist to provide context for ‘Can’t You Hear My
Heartbeat’ and ‘Henery The VIII’. Those that are well-known in their more
original versions are the quickest to be forgotten: Buddy Holly’s ‘Heartbeat’
(probably recorded for a «pairing» with ‘Can’t You Hear My Heartbeat’) and
the Yardbirds’ ‘For Your Love’ only detract from the classic patterns without
adding to them. The sentimental ballads (‘The End Of The World’, ‘I’ll Never
Dance Again’) were not all that great to begin with, and Peter Noone is not the kind of guy to justify fluffy
sentimentality. Only two songs represent semi-original songwriting, courtesy
of the highly limited talent of the band’s rhythm guitarist Keith Hopwood:
‘Don’t Try To Hurt Me’ is a run-of-the-mill little rhythm’n’blues pastiche,
somewhat in the style of very early Kinks (think ‘Nothing In The World Can
Stop Me Worryin’ About That Girl’, etc.), and ‘Tell Me Baby’ is sort of like
a watered-down imitation of the Dave Clark Five. Finally, the good-night-to-y’all closing cover of
Cliff Richard’s ‘Travellin’ Light’ throws Peter Noone onto the ring with
Cliff in a fight for the «Champion Of The Smooth And Suave» title... and I
think that Noone wins on points. More importantly, listening to the song got
me thinking about how much the Monkees’ ‘I Can’t Get Her Off My Mind’ owes to
it, and, consequently, about how there probably wouldn’t have been any Monkees without Herman’s Hermits
to show them the way. Then again, why should we really dream about a world
bereft of Herman’s Hermits or Monkees, in which they act as sometimes
embarrassing, sometimes entertaining, and occasionally even enlightening
court jesters to superior powers? It is only a world in which court jesters
overthrow their superiors, like Malcolm of the Legend Of Kyrandia, that is ultimately doomed to extinction, and,
fortunately for us, we are still living in 1965 here rather than 2025... ohmygosh,
look at the time, actually, I’m outta here! |