IKE & TINA TURNER
Recording years |
Main genre |
Music sample |
1958–1976 |
Classic R&B |
It’s Gonna Work Out Fine
(1961) |
Page
contents:
|
|
|
||||||
Album
released: February 1961 |
V |
A |
L |
U |
E |
More info: |
||
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
||||
Tracks: 1) I’m Jealous; 2) I Idolize You; 3) If; 4) Letter From Tina; 5) You
Can’t Love Two; 6) I Had A Notion; 7) A Fool In Love; 8) Sleepless; 9)
Chances Are; 10) You Can’t Blame Me; 11) You’re My Baby; 12) The Way You Love
Me. |
||||||||
REVIEW Sometimes
I feel a little sad for Ike Turner Jr., whose enormous contributions to the
domain of popular music have been completely overshadowed in mass conscience
by the long and turbulent history of his abusive relationship with Tina —
while fellow musicians and musical historians remain respectful, the common
man on the street these days arguably just has a faint idea of «Ike The
Rapist» who submitted his wife to almost twenty years of torture before she
finally broke free and launched her own star. Admittedly, the idea is true to
a large extent: there is hardly any doubt that Ike treated Tina as his own creation
and his own property — he was her Professor Higgins, she was his obedient
Eliza Doolittle — and even if this was a fairly common attitude at the time,
cultural context is no excuse for acting like a slave owner. But
should this dark side in any way negate the fact that Ike Turner did, in fact, make a star out of Anna
Mae Bullock, whose tremendous stage presence and wild energy would count for
relatively little if she were not provided the «meat and potatoes» through
her husband’s inspired songwriting and boundless inventiveness in the studio?
As usual, there’s a torturous moral ambiguity here at stake, and I am in no
position to make judgements on the ethical side of the situation. Instead,
let’s just concentrate on the music, which, I believe, is going to persevere
anyway long after the mass interest in tabloid details of the Ike & Tina
story has subsided. Ultimately, Ike and Tina will settle their own accounts
between Heaven and Hell (I wonder if they deal out visiting hours down
below?), but what stays with us is
their recorded legacy, and it provides many more sources of inspiration than reading
Tina’s autobiography. |
||||||||
The important thing to remember while listening to
the early singles of Ike & Tina, collected on their first album, is that
by the late 1950s, Ike Turner was already... well, not a star per se, but rather a well-established, creative, driving
vehicle behind quite a lot of star power. He is, in fact, one of the very,
very few African-American R&B musicians who managed to keep up with the
times through three distinctly different decades of artistry — the Fifties,
the Sixties, and the Seventies — and if only his penchant for
self-destruction (and destruction of other people’s lives along the way) had
not reached a peak in the Seventies, it is quite possible he might have made
his mark on subsequent decades as well. The only reason why I had to leave
him out of my Fifties’ chronicle is that his discography throughout that
decade is a mess — mostly singles, recorded under a dozen different names
with a dozen different bands, with Ike acting as either bandleader, composer,
guitar or piano player, and usually combining several of these features. (A
good way to make one’s acquaintance with most of that legacy is through the
Ace compilation Rhythm Rockin’ Blues,
beginning with Jackie Brenston & His Delta Cats’ ‘Rocket 88’ — still the
«first rock and roll song ever recorded» to some people — and going through
twenty more tracks of widely varying stylistic range and quality). Technically, the very first joint recording by Ike
& Tina was ‘Boxtop’,
issued on Tune Town Records in 1958 and credited to «Ike Turner, Carlson
Oliver & Little Ann», but do not expect anything ground-shaking from that
recording — other than a slightly curious wobbly variation on the beat of Bo
Diddley’s ‘Crackin’ Up’, it offers little in terms of excitement, and «Little
Ann» has no more presence here than any regular girl singer, any possible
signs of individuality being suppressed by the limitations of the duet format
with the tenor Carlson Oliver. (If there is
any individuality here, it is Ike’s, who contributes the quirky, comedic bass-baritone
interludes). Above all, it’s very much a «Fifties song», in line with
everything else Ike did back then — cautiously adventurous, never really
boiling over. Things changed in March 1960 with a well-publicized
historical accident, when Ike’s newest composition ‘A Fool In Love’, intended
for one of his regular singer clients Art Lassiter, had to be assigned a new
vocalist when Art failed to show up for the session — and the only vocalist
on hand was Anna Mae Bullock. The song itself is no great shakes, though it
is probably important that its melody is more rock’n’roll (or, at least, «pop
rock») in essence than R&B (I’m thinking of a slowed down version of
‘Great Balls Of Fire’), which no doubt helped its national chart success. But
what made it truly stand out, of course, was Tina’s performance — amusingly,
Ike himself did not think that much of it, even keeping the recording on hold
for a few months, in the hopes that Lassiter would finally come along and
they could just erase «Little Ann»’s results and paste Lassiter’s over the
backing track. Perhaps for Ike, who had already worked with Tina
for several years and was probably accustomed to the timbre, power, and
«gurgle» of her voice, what she did on the song was nothing special — but for
the American public at large, this turned out to be quite a fresh new sound.
Now it’s definitely true that Tina Turner was far from the first black female
performer with a powerful bark; big gals like Big Mama Thornton and (more
recently) Etta James had even thicker, more imposing chords and, in terms of
raw dark power and/or subtlety of expression, could arguably sing Tina under
the table. But they had two drawbacks. One is that they weren’t really pop
singers — Big Mama was a blueswoman through and through, and Etta was too
much of an old-fashioned balladeer. «Black pop» in 1960-61 was really all
about the quickly burgeoning girl group scene, and girls like The Chantels or
The Shirelles were more about harmony than energy. Drawback two is that most of the powerful ladies of
the Fifties, what with all of their flair and independence, still may have
given out a «groomed» vibe — singing it the way it was all taught to them and
professionally pre-rehearsed. Even when you hear Ruth Brown belt it out on a
hot number like ‘Wild Wild Young Men’, there’s still a feeling that the lady
knows her boundaries and does not allow herself any spontaneity (not on the
studio recording, at least) for fear of being considered «unruly». Even when
you get all those girl groups whose members come from tough neighborhoods
where strong character is a pre-requisite for survival, any
rough-and-toughness still has to stay behind the threshold of the studio
doors. It really took Tina Turner to demonstrate that the times were changing
— that, for once, you could actually let your hair down in the studio and expect the public to catch up to
it rather than shy away in disgust. To be perfectly honest right from the start: in the
overall sense of things, I am not a huge fan of Tina Turner’s singing style.
Like quite a few notorious «screamers», black and white, male and female
alike, that appeared on the stage in her wake, she is too often driven by the
passion of the moment, screeching her head off whenever her biochemistry
tells her to and not whenever the song actually demands it. Even here, on her
first try, it is not at all clear that a song about loyalty and devotion to
her man requires a near-constant hystrionic bark all through the verses (so
much so that «The Artettes» on backing vocals come across as a bunch of
white-coat nurses trying to pacify the straitjacketed patient). But personal
enjoyment is one thing, and recognizing the arrival of «streetwise toughness»
on the hitherto well-combed, suit-and-tie-only R&B scene is quite
another. Almost a decade earlier, Ike Turner heralded a new kind of
instrumental sound in the music world with ‘Rocket 88’; now, in an almost
sheer stroke of luck, the good Lord guided his hand to help revolutionize the
art of the vocalist as well. Okay, so this time around, it’s not really so
much his merit as it is Tina’s —
but then again, let’s face it, he did not erase the vocals after all, and
once ‘A Fool In Love’ started climbing up the charts, he must have realized
that from this day on, he would be forever doomed to live in the shadow of
the glory of his own protegé (which certainly explains quite a lot of
that history of abuse over the next sixteen years). The immediate follow-up to ‘A Fool In Love’ was ‘A
Fool Too Long’, an unconcealed melodic and lyrical «sequel» to the original
that flopped and sank without a trace — by now, the public had been spoiled
deeply enough to expect freshness rather than direct self-repetition, and
these days, you won’t even see the song anywhere except on in-depth
retrospectives and completist boxsets. Learning his lesson, Ike quickly
corrected his mistake and gave Tina something totally different: ‘I Idolize
You’ is arguably my favorite song from that period — much bluesier and darker
than its predecessor, it provides a much
better excuse for Tina’s «psychotic» singing as she raves and rants about her
downright unhealthy obsession with her «idol»... an obsession that is both
submissive and dominant at the same time ("oh what a thrill I would get / if I could comfort you baby, and make
you my pet" — amusingly, this verse ended up irritating Ike so much
that for the re-recorded 1966 version, he would change it to "if you want me to beg to you, I’ll forget
my pride"; feel the difference, eh?). Although in terms of style and arrangement, this is
not a complete departure from ‘A Fool In Love’, mood-wise ‘I Idolize You’
goes much further than that, almost bordering on musical pornography; Tina’s
"OW!"s before landing the final line of each chorus sound like
she’s just been bitten on some particularly sensitive erogenous zone, and
even Etta James would probably blush when hearing the proud exhibitionism in
Tina’s voice upon delivery of lyrics like "I would like to make love to you / When the lights are low / And I
would like to SCREEAAM to you baby / Just so I can let you know". We
may be quite accustomed to powerful singers sounding like maniacal sex
addicts today — but name me anyone
who would dare do it with this kind of primal animal intensity before Tina Turner. Here she was,
almost literally converting cultured R&B to low-down dirty punk — and the
general public was actually buying it! Whether he was a little scared himself of his latest
creation or not, Ike then held back a bit with the next single: ‘I’m
Jealous’, released in January 1961, ditched the bluesy darkness, cranked up
the tempo, and took on the guise of a quirky pop ditty, something that would
have been quite fit for any chirpy girl group at the time. This is precisely
the right moment to remember those limitations: Tina’s «barking» style, which
works so perfectly for ‘I Idolize You’, becomes just a tad irritating on this
faster and lighter number, which calls for a more melodic approach in the
vocal department. In the context of the previous song, Tina’s wildness made
it downright scary; here, though, she somehow sounds hysterical for the sake
of hysteria, losing control in a situation where she should have retained it.
Maybe it wasn’t even her own fault — maybe Ike and the others just told her
to keep on screamin’, because that’s what the fans like about her — but,
regardless, this time around the chosen vocal approach spoils what could have
been a perfectly nice-ish (not outstanding) pop number. And that is basically how things are on the entire
first album by the duo, which collects all of their previous A- and B-sides
(with the wise exception of ‘A Fool Too Long’) and adds a bunch of newly
recorded tracks. For every hit, there’s a miss; for every miss, there’s a
realization that what we’re dealing with here is the proverbial «diamond in
the rough» — a brand new talent which is so unusual, there is as of yet no
clear understanding of how it should really be used. Some songs are more
memorable than others; some suffer from over-screaming more than others; some
are more traditional than others — for instance, the only cover on the album,
the slow ballad ‘I Had A Notion’, is an old doo-wop hit from 1953 (by
Atlantic’s own Joe Morris Orchestra featuring Al Savage on vocals) whose only
«fresh» point of attraction is the slash-across-your-vocal-chords delivery by
Tina, which still feels hyperbolic and unnatural. Let me just try and briefly list what I consider to
be highlights. Apart from the already-mentioned ‘A Fool In Love’ and ‘I
Idolize You’, the real good stuff includes ‘If’, a simple enough piece of
bluesy R&B on which Tina throws a hissy fit over her potential hubby
cheating on her (something she’d have to live through with Ike often enough);
‘You Can’t Love Two’, a soulful doo-wop ballad on the exact same topic that,
fortunately enough, features Tina in crooning and belting rather than barking
mode; and ‘Chances Are’, on which Tina’s singing is well accentuated by a grimly
martial bass and a sordidly percussive rhythm guitar part from Ike — on the
whole, in those early days Tina’s presence is much more mesmerizing when she
is in doom-and-gloom mode than when she tries to be sentimental. And it is
definitely more mesmerizing when she sings solo than when she duets with Ike
on the repetitive and static pop songs ‘You Can’t Blame Me’ and ‘You’re My
Baby’, both of which perfectly satisfy the definition of «filler», or when
she slips into full-on recitative mode on ‘Letter From Tina’ — at this point,
her «purely theatrical» skills are not yet developed well enough to keep you
properly transfixed. Admittedly, it would not be fair to expect that the
mere fact of getting a hot new star with a fresh, seductively aggressive take
on life would cause Ike Turner, whose musical ideology had been fairly well
shaped during the 1950s, to immediately revise and revolutionize his styles
of songwriting and production. Take away the unique vocal style and more than
half of these songs would sound perfectly fit for any old R&B or doo-wop
artist from the early, formative days of both genres — and since even the
unique vocal style can easily get obnoxious, The Soul Of Ike & Tina Turner is pretty damn far from a
consistent masterpiece. But there is no denying that the album is convincing
enough as a detailed, sure-fire announcement of a new presence on the scene —
and even more than that, a whole new approach to the art of vocal
performance, a major step forward in the «liberation» of the voice of the pop
singer (particularly the black voice, but there is no doubt that this style
was hugely influential, for instance, on the likes of Janis Joplin as well). It is fun to realize, actually, that two of the
greatest soul singer-ines of the decade — Aretha and Tina — would have their
debut LPs released within days of each other (February 1961), both
introducing their own styles that had quite a bit in common (above all, the
enhanced freedom of self-expression) but were also vividly different: Aretha,
if one might say, as «the Beatle» of R&B and Tina as its proverbial
«Rolling Stone», the «polite and elegant» freedom versus the «aggressive and
hysterical» variety. In popular conscience, the former usually wins over the
latter, which is why Aretha today is #1 on the Rolling Stone list of great
singers and Tina Turner is but #55 (funny enough, sitting comfortably close
to Mick Jagger at #52). But it didn’t start out that way: in 1961, Ike &
Tina Turner were a way hotter
commercial proposition than Aretha, despite all of the «safe and cozy»
reputation of the first years of the new decade. And while I’d be really hard
pressed to say whether I prefer ‘Won’t Be Long’ over ‘I Idolize You’ or vice
versa on a «theoretical», «intellectual» level, there is no question as to
which of the two agrees more with my «biology of purpose» (as per Brian Eno’s
definition)!. |