LOS BRINCOS
Recording years |
Main genre |
Music sample |
1964–1970 |
Classic pop rock |
Cry (1964) |
Page
contents:
|
|
|
||||||
Album
released: 1964 |
V |
A |
L |
U |
E |
More info: |
||
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
||||
Tracks: 1) Dance "The Pulga"; 2)
Es Para Ti; 3) Nila; 4) I’m Not Bad; 5) Bye Bye Chiquilla; 6) I Can’t Make
It; 7) Flamenco; 8) Shag It; 9) Es Como Un Sueño; 10) Cry; 11) What’s
The Matter With You; 12) Don’t Doubt. |
||||||||
REVIEW It
is curious, and even a bit ironic, that arguably the single most notable rock
LP to come out of continental Europe in 1964 — the year that Beatlemania
changed the world forever — appeared not in Germany, or France, or Italy, or
any of the other free countries, but in Francoist Spain, a place where you
would reasonably expect the powers-that-be to tighten their censorial grip on
sinful youth practices with much the same harshness as in the Soviet Union (where
the first «true» rock albums did not officially appear on the market until
the early Eighties). Rock music itself penetrated Spain fairly early
(allegedly, with the opening of American military bases in the mid-1950s),
but record labels were not particularly interested in strange young bands in
the pre-Beatles era, and even if they did sign them up, restricted them to
small bunches of singles and an occasional EP. And the bands themselves were
usually not too great, tentatively mixing local pop standards with shades of
rock’n’roll (or, more commonly, doo-wop and twist) influences, e.g. Los Pájaros Locos
("The Crazy Birds"), whose sound is about as totally inoffensive as
could be expected for the time — the relative equivalent of early French
yé-yé: harmless fun in the evening, not much to remember in the
morning. |
||||||||
Then along came Los Brincos, whose very name was
vaguely suggestive of a link with the Beatles, and Spain was never the same
after that — at least, that’s how it is often presented in history books. The
«Spanish Beatles» were formed in Madrid, sometime in late 1963 or early 1964,
around drummer Fernando Arbex, formerly of Los Estudiantes, one of those
early lite-rock ensembles sometimes credited with releasing the first ever
Spanish rock EP in 1959. After the disintegration of that band, Arbex put
together a new one, clearly modeled after the Beatles, with Manuel
González on bass and two guitar players and singers — Juan Pardo and
the Philippine-born Antonio Morales Junior. By the end of 1964, they managed
to sign up with the pioneering indie label Novola (= nueva ola "New Wave"), releasing a few tentative
singles and then, lo and behold, an entire LP of original compositions before
Christmas ’64, officially making this Spain’s first ever genuinely «rock»
album, and, for that matter, maybe even the first ever genuinely «rock» album
outside the English-speaking world, though of this I cannot be entirely sure
(and, of course, it does depend on what exactly we consider «rock»). In any case, it goes without saying that these
circumstances make Los Brincos a
record of major historical importance, not just for Spain, but for the
history of the evolution of popular music worldwide (though, honestly, I am
not sure if it ever had any direct influence on European pop-rock beyond the
Iberian Peninsula). Do they, however, make it worth checking out if you are not a Spanish teenager in the year
1964? (and, unless you have a time machine and I don’t, you are probably
not). The key factor in such matters is nearly always that little criterion
which I call adequacy: in this case
— the capacity of young people coming from a completely different culture to
not only understand and capture the spirit of their foreign idols, but also
masterfully transform it with bits and pieces of their own cultural identity,
creating an interesting hybrid without making it sound embarrassing for
anyone with a critical eye. (If I had me a TV show or a podcast, I’d make
sure to rattle that last sentence off in two seconds, so as not to embarrass
anyone with a critical eye). I am not sure that the band’s first singles were an
overwhelming success in that department, but at least they most certainly
tried to follow that precise recipé. ‘Cry’ is a slow, mournful, but
loud ballad that tries to integrate bits of American soul, Beatlesque
harmonies (the falsetto oooohs come
straight from ‘She Loves You’), and Spanish flavor — the acoustic flamenco
guitar part that creeps in during the bridge section certainly could not
appear in such a form on any Beatles album from that time. Muddy lo-fi
production values and rather strained vocals prevent the song from being
stunning (fortunately, at least the native accent is not too terribly strong
to ruin the picture), but there is enough originality in the songwriting to
deserve at least a pat on the back for the effort. (Also, kudos for the
opening a cappella vocals — that starting "I-I-I-I-I..." has an
almost proto-progressive rock coloring to it, I’m sure Jon Anderson and Yes
would have been proud). More of an impact was made by the B-side,
unabashedly entitled ‘Flamenco’, sung in Spanish and sounding like Del Shannon
in a ruffle collar — its fast tempo, rising harmonies, and melancholic mood
give out a strong ‘Runaway’ vibe, but the acoustic flamenco guitar is indeed
out there, though the muddy, bass-heavy production takes it out of view after
the introduction. However, it is quite a catchy and efficient song, well
worth the effort and well on the way on becoming a big international hit, had
it been sung in English by better vocalists and featured sharper production
values. As it is, it only became a big hit in Spain, but it was enough to put
Los Brincos on the map anyway. Actually, now that I think about it, ‘Cry /
Flamenco’ must have been the band’s second
single; the first one was much less distinctive from a national point of
view, but more important to classify Los Brincos as a «rock» group. ‘Dance
"The Pulga"’, the band’s own take on inventing a new dance form (pulga is ‘flea’ in Spanish), opens
with a pretty dirty, scruffy guitar riff of the garage variety, and although
the song’s melody owes more to the pre-Beatlesque surf-rock and twist
traditions, its frantic tempo, «unclean» guitar tones, and heavy bass scream
teenage rebellion in a way that neither the Belmonts nor the Shadows could
ever ascend to (or stoop to, whichever way you prefer to judge it). There
doesn’t seem to be anything too distinctly Spanish about it, but not a lot of
people played the musical styles of 1961 with the fervor of a garage rock
band from 1964–65 — and much the same goes for the B-side ‘Bye Bye
Chiquilla’, which takes the melody of Chuck Berry’s ‘Memphis Tennessee’, sets
it to a nursery pop vocal melody, and plays it with much the same sloppy
garage enthusiasm. It’s an odd combination whose exact goals are somewhat
unclear, but at least it’s fun to try and figure them out. Both these singles are on the album, and the rest of
it is somewhat evenly spread between soulful ballads, Beatlesque pop-rock,
and R&B-style rave-ups — the latter showing that Los Brincos were clearly
interested in mastering not only the melodic innovations of their
Anglo-American influences, but the rhythmic, «body-oriented» ones as well
(‘What’s The Matter With You’ is much closer to Manfred Mann than the Beatles,
for instance). Everything is fairly hit-and-miss here: for each weak,
uninventive track like ‘Es Para Ti’ (an uninteresting emulation of the Beach
Boys’ ‘Surfer Girl’ style, or was that the Beatles’ ‘This Boy’ style?
whatever), there is something much more impressive, like the ballad ‘Don’t
Doubt’, which starts out ordinarily but quickly moves into highly soulful
territory, with a first-rate harmony arrangement that both of the
above-mentioned bands would have probably appreciated. There are also some fun moments which probably could
exist only on a Spanish record like this one — for instance, an oddly slowed
down, bombastic, loud and soulful pop number called... ‘Shag It’ (!): my
guess is that they probably wanted some quirky twist on ‘Shake It’, saw that
the first dictionary meaning for "shag" is "shake" and
went ahead with it, thus basically involuntarily creating the world’s first
song called ‘Fuck It’ — in a country with the harshest censorship system in
Western Europe at the time, no less. It actually makes me a little sad that
the song is so slow, though they still cook up a pretty impressive wall of
sound by the end, with wild guitar solos, frantic screaming mixed in with
Beatles-influenced vocal harmonies, and heavy abuse of those cymbals. In the end, I must say that the album exceeded my
expectations. The band’s impressive reliance on their own material, rather
than predictably inferior rock’n’roll covers, is a huge factor here (though I
do wonder whether the lack of covers was not more due to censorship issues,
as it indeed was in the Soviet Union, where you could only get away with
releasing a Chuck Berry song if you rewrote it as one of your own), and Los
Brincos did have enough creativity to not simply set stolen melodies to their
own lyrics, but try and fiddle with the chords themselves. Sound quality is
probably the worst issue here, as well as a sneak suspicion that they sing so
frequently in harmony because both singers’ individual voices happened to be
relatively weak and unexpressive. But stuff like ‘Flamenco’, ‘Don’t Doubt’,
and ‘Dance "The Pulga"’ could easily make it onto any respectable
compilation of early Sixties’ pop-rock, and stuff like ‘Shag It’ shows that,
despite all the rumors, Spanish kids could get pretty rough in the latter
days of Estado Español — certainly much rougher than their Soviet
contemporaries on the other side of Europe. |