THE SEEKERS
Recording years |
Main genre |
Music sample |
1963–2019 |
Classic folk-pop |
Lady Mary (1964) |
Page
contents:
|
|
|
||||||
Album
released: 1963 |
V |
A |
L |
U |
E |
More info: |
||
2 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
||||
Tracks: 1) Dese Bones G’Wine Rise Again; 2) When The Stars
Begin To Fall; 3) Run Come See; 4) This Train; 5) All My Trials; 6) The Light
From The Lighthouse; 7) Chilly Winds; 8) Kumbaya; 9) The Hammer Song; 10)
Wild Rover; 11) Katy Cline; 12) Lonesome Traveller. |
||||||||
REVIEW Today, the
Seekers are mainly remembered as the first Australian band to make it big on
the international scene — several years before the Bee Gees, and a whole
decade before AC/DC, with both of whom they had little in common anyway.
Well, actually, they did have one very important thing in common: just like
the Bee Gees and just like AC/DC, the Seekers were entertainers first and artists
second, which seems to be a fairly common thing indeed for internationally
famous Australian musical teams, probably because Australia is so damn far
from everywhere, you’d really have
to struggle to get yourself noticed. Play it humble and reticent, and you’ll
just be stuck in Sydney with the Melbourne blues again for the entirety of
your sad antipode life — you don’t really have the advantage of sharing
Greenwich Village as your home turf, where you can just cool it and wear a
frown and still get written about in media that matter. |
||||||||
Really, this is the first thing that springs to mind
when listening to the Seekers’ very first album, which, upon its original
release, did not even chart in Australia, let alone the rest of the world
(later, after the Seekers gained fame, it was published for the international
market as simply The Seekers, with
the same tracks but in a different running order). At the time, the folk
quartet focused exclusively on traditional ballads and spirituals, neither
writing their own material nor yet taking it out of the hands of contemporary
songwriters — the track list here is pretty much the same as in the general
Pete Seeger or Peter, Paul, and Mary repertoire. There is hardly even
anything specifically related to Australia, although the band’s very first
single was indeed a rendition of ‘Waltzing Matilda’ — not being an expert, I
cannot say if this is due to particular dearth of the specifically Australian
folk tradition or to the fact that the Seekers, from the very start, were
aiming to fit in on the international scene. Anyway, what matters is not the precise scope of the
material, but the approach taken by the band. From the opening vocal lines
and acoustic chords of ‘Dese Bones G’wine Rise Again’, the good old Negro
spiritual retelling the beginning of the Book of Genesis in an accessible
fashion, it is clear that the Seekers are not here to emphasize the Deepest
Depth, Most Serious Seriousness, and Most Holy Holiness of the folk tradition
— on the contrary, they are promoting its lightness, its fun, its ability to
ignite a merry campfire inside the hearts of listeners, and even, where
possible, its humor and irony. Athol Guy slaps his double bass like a proper
village square entertainer; Keith Potger and Bruce Woodley chop up their
guitars like hyper-energetic pop musicians; and Judith Durham, the group’s
only non-playing singer (later, she would occasionally sit in on keyboards),
raises her energetic voice over those of her male companions with all the
verve and passion of an inspired Soviet Young Pioneer. (The latter is not
necessarily a compliment, at least not in some contexts, but Judith is
alright). People who tolerate rather than enjoy the Seekers
tend to point to the beauty of Durham’s voice as the main, if not the only,
reason to listen to this stuff in the first place — I’m guessing that they
will point to ‘All My Trials’ as the indisputable highlight of the album,
since this is the only song here on which Judith not only takes lead, but is
actually allowed to sing solo all the time. But while she does have a
stronger and more flexible voice than, say, Shirley Collins, it is a fairly
ordinary strong and flexible voice, with not a lot of unique personality to
it; I probably would not be able to tell Durham from a thousand other lovely
folk maidens going all the way from the early Sixties and into the present
age. On the other hand, she is a good alternative if, like some people I
know, you happen to be aurally allergic to the sharp and shrill pitch of the
likes of Joan Baez — now there is a
singer with an unmistakable identity, yet that particular identity can just
as easily piss off people as enchant them. At least Durham is steadily
reliable; I can’t imagine how she could be «hated» on an instinctive level. In any case, the Seekers are first and foremost a group, and they are at their best when
they play, sing, and juggle their harmonies in ways that combine folksy
earnestness with doo-wop playfulness (do not forget that the Seekers,
initially the Escorts, actually started out as a doo-wop group) — for
instance, on the non-stop power trip that is ‘The Light From The Lighthouse’,
with each member taking on lead vocals for one verse and various members
constantly going off on their own tangents during the chorus, creating a
rich, complex, unpredictable kaleidoscope of vocal effects. I have seen a few
listeners complain about the excessive «religiousness» of the record, but
nothing could be further from the truth: the Seekers just want you to get
caught up in this game they play, they don’t actually want to make you go to
church. In terms of musicianship, there is nothing particularly
outstanding here, but the Seekers always knew how to play their instruments —
in fact, Woodley’s acoustic lead that introduces ‘The Hammer Song’ makes me
wish they would have thrown on a couple pure instrumentals, being played so
cleanly, precisely, and meaningfully. Other than that brief bit, however,
instrumental performance always takes second place to group harmonies, even
when the commonly used guitars cede their places to the more rarely used
banjos and fiddles. The most important instrument, however, is Guy’s double
bass, giving most of the songs a strong rhythmic «bottom» and constantly
luring you into clapping your hands, tapping your feet, or just giving it up
and getting to dancing — entertainment, remember? This is the closest that early
folk comes not just to «folk pop», but to «dance-oriented folk pop», and
there is nothing wrong with that — on the contrary, this is a nice fresh
change from all the exaggerated seriousness of the typical folk scene, even
if, at the time, it meant that the Seekers would always be looked at rather
condescendingly by their brethren from across both oceans. I mean, the album, as well as most of the stuff that
followed, can easily allow us to treat the Seekers as the Monkees of the folk
movement — but given that it did not take us too long to learn to love the
Monkees, or, at least, give them their own due respect, there is nothing
wrong about doing the same for Judith Durham and her well-meaning Aussie
compatriots. As for this debut album, though, while it does introduce the
Seekers, it is also understandable that, with such a predictable song
selection, it is more interesting in the overall exclusive musical context of
1963 than it is in the overall context of the band’s entire career — so let
us close this page, and move on. |
|
|
|
||||||
Album
released: 1964 |
V |
A |
L |
U |
E |
More info: |
||
3 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
||||
Tracks: 1) The Wreck Of The Old ’97; 2)
Danny Boy; 3) Waltzing Matilda; 4) Cotton Fields; 5) Lemon Tree; 6) Gotta
Travel On; 7) With My Swag All On My Shoulder; 8) Plaisir D’Amour; 9) Isa
Lei; 10) Whisky In The Jar; 11) Five Hundred Miles; 12) The Gypsy Rover; 13)
South Australia. |
||||||||
REVIEW
When
the band’s second Australian album was re-released in the UK in 1971, three
years after the Seekers’ first breakup, the record label people, searching
for a more interesting title than just The
Seekers, eventually settled on Roving
With The Seekers — probably by association with one of the song titles
(‘The Gypsy Rover’), but one could just as well tie the new title to the
areal expansion seen in the track list. Introducing
The Seekers, for the most part, defined its musical mission as
introducing the average Greenwich Village set to Australian audiences. On The Seekers, the band broadens its
horizons quite significantly — first, with songs taken from its native turf
(‘Waltzing Matilda’, ‘South Australia’), and second, with tunes that have
their origins from all over the world, even if most of them probably still
came to the Seekers’ attention through the likes of Peter, Paul, and Mary. |
||||||||
Thus, Will Holt’s ‘Lemon Tree’ has its roots in a
Brazilian folk song — incidentally, you can still hear a faint touch of Latin
rhythms in Peter, Paul and Mary’s version, but they have all been neutralized
in the Seekers’ strictly 4/4 rhythm play; on the positive side, their version
is louder, rawer, more campfire-friendly than Peter, Paul and Mary’s
china-cup performance, so you can make your own fun choice here. ‘Plaisir
D’Amour’ is, of course, the classic(al) French romance song underlying Elvis’
‘Can’t Help Falling In Love’; not entirely sure where the Seekers nicked it
from, since most of the song’s famous covers post-date rather than pre-date
their version (Joan Baez, Marianne Faithfull, Nana Mouskouri etc.) — in any
case, Judith Durham’s delivery is as fine as anybody’s. ‘Isa Lei’ takes us to
Fiji, and the guys even make a serious effort to perform it in its native
Austronesian tongue — granted, Fiji is geographically closer to Australia
than it is to the UK or even to the US, but musically the song still finds
itself translated to the Anglo-Saxon folk language (and is credited to A. W.
Caten, the bandmaster who originally set the lyrics to a foxtrot arrangement,
rather than to anybody who is actually from Fiji). Finally, ‘Whisky In The
Jar’, of course, possesses a specifically Irish flavor, which is somewhat
respected by the band as they try to reproduce the essence of a pub drinking
song... but they are no Dubliners, after all. A notable fact is that the album includes the
Seekers’ first self-penned song: ‘With My Swag All On My Shoulders’, credited
to all four band members, is a lively country-pop saga of a ramblin’ man
travelling all over Australia, clearly self-referential to a degree and much
closer in style to the merry, upbeat travel tales from the Irish tradition
than to the generally more moody and introspective takes on the subject,
common for places like the Appalaches. It’s nothing too special, but it is
nice to see how authentic they could sound on something they’d created
themselves (at least, I assume they
created it on their own — though I do realize one should never trust
songwriting credits on those rusty LPs from days long gone by). Linguistic
note: "swag" should be understood here in its specifically
Australian meaning of "load", rather than the 18th century slang
meaning of "loot", let alone the 21st century slang meaning of...
well, whatever "swag" is translated to in Commontongue. The songs I like the most on here, unsurprisingly,
are the ones featuring the exquisite lead vocal talents of Judith Durham:
unfortunately, I’ve heard one too many versions of ‘Danny Boy’ to be inspired
by the song ever again (though some of those high notes she hits are
breathtaking if you are in the right mood), but Hedy West’s ‘500 Miles’, a beautiful
song that was still fairly new and unspoiled at the time, is arguably the
best rendition of it up to that time — Durham’s solo delivery is naturally
more gorgeous than versions by the Journeymen or the Kingston Trio, and she
gives the song more depth and breadth than Mary Travers; it is one of those
few occasions where you (almost) begin to forget just how «pop» the Seekers
were, and (almost) start looking to them for spiritual guidance. That said, The
Seekers still makes precious little effort at crossing the line
separating loyal interpretation from original creativity... and why should
it? At the time of its release (I have not been able to find the precise
date, but I’m guessing some time early in 1964, before the band took off for
Europe), the Seekers were still based in Australia, where demand for local performers
of classic folk material was high and supply of high-quality bands relatively
low — who else could deliver ‘Cotton Fields’ or ‘Gotta Travel On’ for the
local crowds with as much verve, fun, and authenticity? It would not be until
the band had set a tentative foot in European waters — where they could
hardly be looked upon at first as anything but a cute musical curio from the
land of kangaroos and didgeridoos — that they would get a genuine incentive
for breaking out of that pattern. For now, though, they seemed relatively
content to have produced the finest-sounding and highest-charting version of
‘Waltzing Matilda’ for their hometown market. Hmm, was it actually the
highest-charting version of ‘Waltzing Matilda’ in Australia? I’m not that
sure, honestly. But I’d like to believe that it was. |
|
|
|
||||||
Album
released: 1964 |
V |
A |
L |
U |
E |
More info: |
||
2 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
||||
Tracks: 1) This Little Light Of Mine; 2)
Morning Town Ride; 3) The Water Is Wide; 4) Well Well Well; 5) Lady Mary; 6) We’re Moving On; 7) Ox Driving Song;
8) Kumbaya; 9) Blowin’ In The Wind; 10) The Eriskay Love Lilt; 11) Chilly
Winds; 12) What Have They Done To The Rain. |
||||||||
REVIEW
The
third and last Seekers album before the band «sold out» and broke through to
international fame is even more of a discographical mess than the previous
two: in Germany it was released simply as The Seekers (though it had nothing to do with the self-titled
second album), in the US it was titled The
New Seekers (as if there were The
Old Seekers?), and several years later, after the group had disbanded, it
was re-released for the European markets as The Four & Only Seekers. The diagnostic sign is that they all
begin with ‘This Little Light Of Mine’, so we’re just gonna let it shine and
this will give us the power divine to battle the evil schemes of nefarious
record label executives. |
||||||||
Although upon first sight the music here seems to be
just the same standard Seekers fare, in reality there already were some
important changes in the air. The most significant of these was that the band
had finally reached the British shores, where they originally intended to
spend only a little time, but were quickly picked up by the World Record Club
label and offered a chance to work and record five hundred, uh, that is, ten
thousand miles away from home. Naturally, they could not go back home this
ole way, because who the heck would prefer Melbourne over London? With much
more lucrative commercial proposals, chances to mingle with heroes of the
British Invasion, superb recording studios, and even the World Record Club’s
own Bobby Richards Orchestra at their disposal, the only catch was that they
ran the danger of getting swallowed up in a much larger, much more
competitive field — but in all actuality, few, if any, bands in Britain
sounded like the Seekers at the time: straightforward folk was more of an
individual affair, represented by loners like Shirley Collins, while bands
that did cover folk repertoire did it more in a folk-rock vein, like the
closely titled Searchers, whose first love was rock’n’roll and who only
gradually came to embrace a more «traditionally-sanctioned» sound. If I understand correctly (reliable chronological
information on the Seekers is not the easiest thing to come by), Hide & Seekers was recorded and
released before the group’s fateful encounter with Tom Springfield that
produced ‘I’ll Never Find Another You’; at least, there is no mention of
anything of the sort in the original liner notes, which mainly just praise
the Seekers for their work on the «international folksong» circuit. Indeed,
almost every inclusion on the album goes back at least 50 to 100–200 years
back in history: almost, because
the band also tentatively begins to acknowledge the new «post-folk»
generation of singer-songwriters, covering Dylan’s ‘Blowin’ In The Wind’ and
Malvina Reynolds’ ‘What Have They Done To The Rain’ — neither of the two
covers does anything particularly interesting to the originals, but if you
are in love with Judith or anything, you will be thrilled to hear her take
lead vocals on both of them. The big musical difference is the presence of the
Bobby Richards Orchestra on at least half of the tracks, which, some might
say, sentimentalizes and cheapens the effort, while others might insist that
it adds a sense of grandiosity and epicness to the band’s formerly secluded,
chamber-like sound. I would be in the middle here — I don’t think the
orchestra manages to spoil any of the songs, largely because they had the
good sense to keep it politely in the background, without overwhelming either
the singers or even the players; but I also think that each and every song
here would work just as efficiently on its own, because when the Seekers are
really in the zone, they need no amplification to convince us of their worth.
I do like the extra sonic depth of
the production, though: a subtle bit of echo / reverb on the vocals goes a
longer way to achieve that coveted effect of solemnity than an entire
orchestra. Case in point — ‘Lady Mary’, an old ballad on a
fairly mysterious subject whose lyrics almost ring like an Edgar Allan Poe
poem; it seems to have first been published in Harper’s Magazine in 1871,
credited to somebody called Francis Behrynge, but the Seekers most likely
heard it from Joan Baez (oddly enough, both this song and several other
traditional ones, even including ‘Kumbaya’, are unscrupulously credited to
all four band members on the original vinyl; apparently, the people at World
Record Club were ever so much more business-savvy than those at W&G). The
opening orchestral swoop, with a really cheap violin line, promises you schmaltz;
but once Judith steps in with the opening line ("he came from his palace
grand..."), the orchestra humbly retreats to the pit, letting the lady
overwhelm you with her interpretation — which, I must say, in this particular
case totally puts Baez to shame. Joan sings the song more or less like she
sings everything else, with a steady, even type of phrasing throughout;
Judith imbues it with Shakesperian grandness, with a sharp shift in pitch
from "the look in his sad dark eyes / more tender than words could
be" to "but I was nothing to him / and he was the world to me"
that puts such a stern, tragic flair into "but I was nothing to
him" that it really makes you care for the poor broken-hearted
protagonist. In the end, the strings neither spoil nor help out the picture —
but the faraway, ghostly production on Judith’s voice makes a lot of
difference. It is not often that you find a Seekers track which can make you
forget all about the lightweight nature of this band, but ‘Lady Mary’ is that
early masterpiece which does the trick. Other than that, the record goes a bit too heavy on
the spiritual side: ‘This Little Light Of Mine’, ‘Well Well Well’, ‘We’re
Moving On’, and ‘Kumbaya’ (which, along with ‘Chilly Winds’, was specially
re-recorded for this album), almost turn the album into a celebration of
«Negro Gospel», as the liner notes describe the material, which is a bit of a
step back from the emphasized diversity of the previous LP. There is plenty
of verve in those performances, of course, but hardly any ground for offering
inventive personal interpretation, as in the case of ‘Lady Mary’, and there
is only so much spiritual demand for ‘Kumbaya’ in our life that we can take,
I suppose. There are also so many versions of the Scottish classic ‘The Water
Is Wide’ that this particular one, on which Bruce takes lead vocals, is just
«nice» (for a special type of experience, I’d rather pull out Dylan’s
performance from the Rolling Thunder Revue). Perhaps the best news, as a whole, is that, despite
the changed circumstances, the Seekers had not lost their original,
semi-professional, semi-homebrewn charm; the deeper production and the
orchestral arrangements certainly put them on a throne and elevate them above
the campfire which they shared with us on the previous two albums, but not
high enough to prevent us from still sharing a sense of unity. That sense
would eventually be diminished, exactly the way it works with so many artists
spoiled by fame and fortune, but Hide
& Seekers does not even hint at potential disappointments to come. |